top of page
13834_CLASS logo.png

The International Institute for Sustainable Laboratories (I2SL) has created the LabSavers campaign

to provide resources and encourage public and private lab owners, managers, and researchers to

clean out and evaluate lab space across their research campuses each year in spring, or whenever is

convenient.

Why conduct a lab clean-out and space assessment?

  • Inventory, consolidate, and properly store lab supplies

  • Dispose of (or reuse) excess chemicals safely 

  • Repurpose old or unwanted equipment where needed

  • Evaluate lab space and storage and optimize for better research efficiency

 

I2SL’s LabSavers tool kit below consists of guidelines for conducting a lab clean-out and space evaluation at a research institution, sample materials to promote the campaign in a building or across a campus, and a how-to guide for implementation. Promotional materials include a logo, customizable fliers, a poster, and digital signage for lobby kiosks or mounted TV monitors. The LabSavers program is meant to provide suggestions and templates, but facility managers, green labs professionals, EHS staff, and research or student leaders should tailor the program and customize the materials to fit their buildings and participants.

We’d love to hear about how you used these resources to conduct lab clean-out/space evaluation and how the effort went, especially if you also changed how lab space is being used and saved the need for new construction or additions. You can share your results and before-and-after photos with I2SL to info@i2sl.org, and we can share your case study.

Looking for an example of a lab clean-out and space evaluation? Watch this talk presented by Suzann Staal and Ethan Carter of the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus during I2SL’s 2024 Education Week. 

iStock-1361816443.jpg
iStock-463834729.jpg
tool kit

LabSavers Tool Kit
Please click on the icons below to download items in the tool kit.

Read this guide on implementing I2SL’s LabSavers campaign and using the promotional resources before you get started.

A quick guide on conducting a lab clean-out, including suggestions for promoting participation and reducing equipment, lab supplies, and chemicals. 

A quick guide on conducting a lab space evaluation in research facilities, including key colleagues to include and resources for reusing and sharing equipment.

Promote LabSavers in your organization with 11x17 posters or an 8.5x11 flier; you can customize the PowerPoint versions with placeholders for dates, contact information, and logistics.

Promote LabSavers in your organization with this 8.5x11 flier that can be customized with before-and-after photos to inspire others and logistical information.

Customize the text and photos in this file to make a digital kiosk sign or cafeteria screen posting. Contact the building manager or event coordinator to post.

13834_CLASS logo.png

Use the LabSavers logo on materials or with social media posts to various networks; You can use the text below as example when you post with photos. You can also use one of the social media graphics we created that are sized for all social media channels.

It’s time to do some spring cleaning in our laboratories! De-clutter labs and maximize space for research during our LabSavers campaign. [Your Organization] will be conducting lab clean-outs between [insert dates] and space assessments if relevant. [Insert URL or contact information of your organization]. #CleanLabsSaveSpace #LabSavers

Lab Space Assessment and Realloaction Processes at Three University Campuses

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical School
University of Colorado Boulder College of Engineering and Applied Sciences (CEAS)
University of California San Diego (UCSD) Scripps Institute of Oceanography (SIO)
What is the school’s or institution’s policy on assigning lab space?
See CU Anschutz Research Space Guidelines
MOUs are signed by new and existing principal investigators (PIs) and renewed ever two years. No space commitments or promises are given in new faculty offer letters; instead, their MOU documents space allocation prior to their onsite visit, which ensures space offered to new faculty has been approved by the department and dean's office.
Which campus leader gave the charge to conduct lab space assessment and reallocation?
Dean of the Medical School in 2021
Dean of the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Authority delegated to the Vice Chancellor of Marine Sciences (VCMS) by the Chancellor of UCSD in ~2023. The Scripps Space Management Committee (SSMC) identifies space solutions, which are provided to the VCMS for approval.
How is space surveyed?
In 2021, the space was first surveyed by two teams walking about 530,000 square feet of total space. A floor-by-floor or unit-by-unit “mini” survey effort (on a rolling cycle so that each floor or unit is visited within every a certain number of years) is planned for launch in FY 2026. 
A full space audit of all space (lab, office, graduate research assistant, administrative) is conducted by the dean's office every two years. This serves as a double-check to the annual space data collected by the individual departments and programs.  
Data is collected for the Space Utility Value calculation (see below). Annual walkthroughs of space are conducted by each faculty or PI. In addition to the SSMC, there is a Faculty Space Advisory Committee (FSAC), some of whom serve as voting members of the SSMC, to advise the VCMS on policy and assist with space disputes.
Who does the surveying?
The two teams conducting the lab space survey in 2021 included senior scientists, School of Medicine (dean and next-in-line leadership), Research Affairs, EH&S, and Facilities staff. 
For annual space data collection, chairs and directors oversee the process with the help of their operational staff in their respective departments and programs. For the biennial space audit, the Assistant Dean for Operations in the Dean's Office oversees the process with help from operational staff. 
Data to determine the Space Utility Value calculation is typically collected by the SIO Director of Space Management and the SIO Space Analyst. Annual walkthroughs of space for each faculty or PI is done by at least two FSAC members and the Director of Space Management and/or the Senior Space Analyst; the latter two participate in all space walkthroughs for consistency across the organization. 
What metrics are collected?
The 2021 evaluation assessed lab spaces a scale of 1-5 (where 1 was storage/clutter and 5 was overcrowded) and compared total grant dollars to research space. In 2023 they transitioned to wet research expenditure compared to wet research space. Expanded efforts include an annual Research Productivity Assessment, based on CU Anschutz Research Space Guidelines and a PI Scorecard exercise (see below). 

Currently the following metrics are collected annually for  each PI with wet lab space:
  1. Wet lab-based expenditures only
  2. Space (assigned as Wet Research ASF of bench/open lab bays and alcoves only)
  3. Lab Personnel directly supported by the research program only - no interns, no visitors)
  1.  Space assigned: Includes building, room number, and square footage
  2. Research expenditures: Median is calculated for each unit for comparison across the PIs within that unit
  3. People: Includes number of post-docs and graduate students in each research group for each PI (co-advised students count as one half for each PI); the average is then calculated for each unit for comparison across the PIs within that unit and across the college
  4. Some units track the number of grant proposals written and grant proposals funded. 
  1. Average annual direct cost funding over the past three years
  2. Space Allocation: Includes faculty offices; office space for the students, postdocs, visitors, specialists, project scientists, engineers, staff researchers, program analysts, administrative staff; lab space and research support areas; and storage
  3. Lab users: Includes staff, visiting scholars, specialists, project scientists, postdocs, graduate and undergraduate students
How is lab space use analyzed (e.g., PI Scorecard, median, Space Utility Value)?
The PI Scorecard Score is based on expenditures per square foot.
The median is calculated in expenditures per average square foot (ASF), as well as averrage size of the research group per ASF. 
The Space Utility Value is calculated based on dollars per square foot and average sqaure footage per person. For example, a faculty member has a three-year average of $275,000 in direct costs, combined space allocation of 1,800 SF, and supervises eight people: $275,000 ÷ 1,800 = $153/SF; t1,800 ASF ÷ 8 = 225 ASF/person; so the Space Utility Value would be $153 × 225, or $34,425 per person.
What type of scale is used for rating the lab space?
RED = $0/SF to 100/SF: Immediate reduction of spaceYELLOW = $101/SF to $175/SF: Action needed in six months to two years to reduce spaceGREEN = $176/SF or higher: No action required 
RED = Below median $GREEN = Above median $They do take into consideration the size of research group per ASF.
SIO faculty and PIs' spaces with a Space Utility Value in the lower quartile are labeled Underutilized Space, and those with a Space Utility value in the upper quartile are labeled Overutilized Space.
Which indivduals or groups are involved in making decisions for lab space reallocation?
The School of Medicine Dean's Office and Research Affairs, in communication with the department chair.
Dean of the CEAS in collaboration with department chairs and program directors. 
Faculty or PIs in the lower quartile are asked to provide additional information or extenuating circumstances, and FSAC does walkthrough with the faculty to detemine what space should be rescinded. 
How is reallocation implemented?
A template spreadsheet is given to each department head with the name of the PIs that are rated YELLOW or RED and requests are made for space adjustment for those labs. 
A spreadsheet of Faculty Activity Metrics is sent to each department comparing space use within the unit and across PIs. History and expenditures are taken into consideration, and  space reallocation suggestions are discussed with the Assistant Dean for Operations and the Chair. If agreed upon, the Dean's office empowers and supports the Chair to carry out the reallocation, which is followed up with an MOU. 
A report on space recommended to be rescinded for each faculty/PI with Space Utility Value in the lower quartile is voted on by the SSMC and approved by the VCMS. Rescinded space goes to the institutional reserve to be used when new space arise at the Institution. 
How often is the process repeated?
Data is compiled annually PowerBI using Archibus and WebSpace data from Planning and Central Finance.
Annually
Annually, the SIO Director of Capital Programs and Space Management, the Deputy Director of Research, and Chair of the FSAC will present to the SSMC a review of objective Space Utility Value for every SIO faculty and PI.
What are the estimated costs avoided through lab space assessment? 
Approximately $60 million total ($44 million in the first first evaluation, $15.5 million with the next evaluation), using  average savings of $1 million per 1,000 SF.
Starting space documentation with an MOU before new faculty members join avoids additional costs and time associated with space requests from new faculty after accepting an offer letter. Ongoing space use and efficiency data documentation avoids expensive lab changes or renovations. Ongoing tracking and reporting leads to increased productivity for grant applications.  
Is there anything else to note?
CU Anschutz received a 2023 International Institute for Sustainable Laboratories Award for its 2021 lab cleanup and lab space optimization efforts. A webinar recording about the effort can be found on the I2SL LabSavers web page.
CEAS does not allocate lab space to emeritus faculty, unless there is an active grant that supports it.  
The focus on space assessment and allocation at SIO is a result of a January 2023 UCSD Space Allocation Report  showing inequity in space allocation between men and women, which was also published in a January 2023 article in Science, which noted that a high percentage of space was assigned to emeritus faculty: “Also contributing are emeritus faculty, 86% of them men, who hold nearly one-quarter of all space at SIO.”
Labs2Zero
Diamond
Aircuity
Alexandria
Cell Signaling Technology
Millipore Sigma
Siemens
Platinum
I2SL is a 1% for the
Planet Environmental Partner.
1% for the Planet Environmental Partner
International Institute for Sustainable Laboratories
Dedicated to advancing sustainable laboratories globally.
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

Copyright © 2024 International Institute for Sustainable Laboratories (I2SL). All rights reserved.

bottom of page